![[-]](https://www.chinaphonearena.com/forum/images/collapse.png "[-]")
the first is an old version of antutu. the Haier scores 10.000 on the new**. if you go far enough back, samsung S3 scores 10.000 on old antutu versions*. I'm going to guess the second one is also from the stone age. and yes, it is. just look at the blue loading bar.
the only dual-core thing I've seen score over 10.000 on antutu is the 1.7 - 2.0 Ghz Cortex A15 chips in the Google Nexus 10 tablet or Voyo A15, which score about 12000-13500 with a very advanced graphical chip on their side. So there you have it. It's only somewhat worse than +/- 1.8 Ghz Cortex A15. pretty much what you'd expect on the basis of DMIPS (1.5x3.3 = 4.95; 1.8x3.5 = 6.3).
even 10.000 probably understates its power, though, judging by how much antutu underestimates, for example, the Nexus 4's quad core 1.5Ghz Krait chip. There's no way that one is slower than an MTK T.
*
** "5.The Antutu benchmark result is now to about 10700-10800"
ps. the GPU scores similar to the Samsung S3's on most of these; nothing wrong with it:
and yes, this is in combination with the same CPU.
the only dual-core thing I've seen score over 10.000 on antutu is the 1.7 - 2.0 Ghz Cortex A15 chips in the Google Nexus 10 tablet or Voyo A15, which score about 12000-13500 with a very advanced graphical chip on their side. So there you have it. It's only somewhat worse than +/- 1.8 Ghz Cortex A15. pretty much what you'd expect on the basis of DMIPS (1.5x3.3 = 4.95; 1.8x3.5 = 6.3).
even 10.000 probably understates its power, though, judging by how much antutu underestimates, for example, the Nexus 4's quad core 1.5Ghz Krait chip. There's no way that one is slower than an MTK T.
*
** "5.The Antutu benchmark result is now to about 10700-10800"
ps. the GPU scores similar to the Samsung S3's on most of these; nothing wrong with it:
and yes, this is in combination with the same CPU.