Who's Online
|
There are currently 2637 online users. [Complete List] » 3 Member(s) | 2634 Guest(s)
|
|
|
Thread Rating:
- 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
MP 809T
|
Posts: 14
Threads: 0
Joined: 2013-08-02
Points:
120
Reputation: +9
(2014-03-16, 23:55)gerstavros Wrote: There is also MT6592 model with 2GB RAM.
What do you mean swap support? Does it use a swap partition in the internal nand?
Anyone knowing what happens with NFC? Does it exist? I've seen informations about the mentioned variety, often callen "809t plus". I think all the other versions are the same (MTK6582, 1/4GB, 720x1280) with fake specs.
I don't know, where the swap partition is located in file system. When i fire the command "free" in terminal emulator, the mentioned values are displayed.
Posts: 14
Threads: 0
Joined: 2013-08-02
Points:
120
Reputation: +9
I found out how to get rid of fake hardware specs.
You'll have to edit two files in /system/etc, agold_cheat_evaluating_software.xml and changeram.xml
In agold_cheat_evaluating_software.xml remove all lines between and .
In changeram.xml change these lines to:
Reboot yout phone and you're done.
I ran Antutu benchmark from Play Store. Here is the result:
jerzyjerzy and derauer like this post
Posts: 39
Threads: 0
Joined: 2013-06-09
Points:
351
Reputation: +28
2014-03-22, 05:41
(This post was last modified: 2014-03-22, 05:44 by gerstavros.)
Wtf, it is so easy to cheat the Antutu ?
EDIT: Tried to change the files, but system partition is read-only on mine, although i have root access . I use xplore, and adb. Can anybody find a solution to my problem?
You like this post
Posts: 14
Threads: 0
Joined: 2013-08-02
Points:
120
Reputation: +9
(2014-03-22, 05:41)gerstavros Wrote: Tried to change the files, but system partition is read-only on mine, although i have root access .
You'll have to edit build.prop. Find to.secure, change value to 0, save and reboot. After that, you're able to mount system partition r/w.
Posts: 39
Threads: 0
Joined: 2013-06-09
Points:
351
Reputation: +28
2014-03-23, 22:52
(This post was last modified: 2014-03-23, 22:54 by gerstavros.)
(2014-03-23, 19:00)MKKLR21 Wrote: You'll have to edit build.prop. Find to.secure, change value to 0, save and reboot. After that, you're able to mount system partition r/w. actually the ro.secure is in /default.prop. And i cannot obviously edit any file in root partition.
I ll try the hard way, read back the system partition, edit the image at pc, and reflash it
But am i the only one with this problem??
You like this post
Posts: 14
Threads: 0
Joined: 2013-08-02
Points:
120
Reputation: +9
In my ROM version 109_v82_hydy_hd_20131225 there's a setting "to.secure" in build.prop. It's set to 1 by default. When I set it to 0, I'm able to mount /system r/w (there's "ro.secure" in default.prop, which is set to 1).
Posts: 39
Threads: 0
Joined: 2013-06-09
Points:
351
Reputation: +28
(2014-03-24, 00:01)MKKLR21 Wrote: In my ROM version 109_v82_hydy_hd_20131225 there's a setting "to.secure" in build.prop. It's set to 1 by default. When I set it to 0, I'm able to mount /system r/w (there's "ro.secure" in default.prop, which is set to 1). I have the same rom, there is no to.secure in build.prop (which line is in yours?), and i cannot anyway edit this file as system is not writable even if i have root access, and i am not crazy
Posts: 39
Threads: 0
Joined: 2013-06-09
Points:
351
Reputation: +28
(2014-03-24, 00:01)MKKLR21 Wrote: In my ROM version 109_v82_hydy_hd_20131225 there's a setting "to.secure" in build.prop. It's set to 1 by default. When I set it to 0, I'm able to mount /system r/w (there's "ro.secure" in default.prop, which is set to 1). I read back the system partition with flash tool, mounted it but it was still read only even on pc.
Finally i made a backup from cwm, edited the build.prop in system.tar.a, by adding the to.secure=0, and restored it. After boot, i checked the build.prop and it was still stock! "to.secure=0" wasn't there, but system is writable now.
Odd enough
You and jerzyjerzy like this post
Posts: 14
Threads: 0
Joined: 2013-08-02
Points:
120
Reputation: +9
OK, I did some investigation on this topic. Looks like I added this line in build.prop (it was some time ago and I could't remember) and I made a typo (must be ro.secure).
Now I wonder why I could gain write access to /system. I made quite a lot of modifications and I can't say which one had this effect.
Posts: 39
Threads: 0
Joined: 2013-06-09
Points:
351
Reputation: +28
(2014-03-24, 14:29)MKKLR21 Wrote: OK, I did some investigation on this topic. Looks like I added this line in build.prop (it was some time ago and I could't remember) and I made a typo (must be ro.secure).
Now I wonder why I could gain write access to /system. I made quite a lot of modifications and I can't say which one had this effect. I was sure it was ro.secure :p
I don't either know how now i have writable system
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
|
|